September 25, 2012

Speech Vs. Graffiti

Credit: Reuters/Brendan Mcdermid

“Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one." -Abbott Joseph Liebling
Apparently, you have the right to say whatever you want on a subway ad in America—if you can afford it.
In theory we all collectively own public property, since we all pay for it, and can use it as we wish. In practice, you or I cannot plaster quotes on billboards all over subway platforms whenever we want to. You also cannot, through the legal system, enforce guidelines that prevent hate speech from greeting you every time you take public transit. The legal fiction that everyone can say whatever they want in public is used to justify forcing you to hear the opinions of those with money. Exhibit A:


This is an ad was paid for by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, whose executive director is Islamophobic blogger Pamela Geller. You would imagine that the MTA and other public transit organizations would prefer to sidestep the controversy altogether simply doing business with another advertiser. Well, initially, they did.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority in New York initially refused to run Geller's ad, saying it was "demeaning." But U.S. District Court Judge Paul Engelmayer ruled last month that it is protected speech under the First Amendment.
"Our hands are tied," MTA spokesman Aaron Donovan said. "Under our existing ad standards as modified by the injunction, the MTA is required to run the ad." 
Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, backed publication of the "patently offensive" ads. 
"More offensive would be their censorship because that would violate the guarantee of free expression of all ideas regardless of how distasteful they are," she said.“Most offensive?” Really?

If Geller had the same rights as you or me, she could say whatever she wanted—on her blog, standing on a street corner, or in a dark room by herself—without having police repel from the rafters and drag her to prison. But she had more rights than you, because you are not executive director of an organization, and therefore you cannot buy ad space to amplify your speech.

For instance, if you were to assert the right to speech like Geller can speak by doing something like…

Via Israel Facts
…then you would be breaking the law. Because you didn't pay for the ad (even though you are a partial owner of what is theoretically a public space). That’s graffiti. You are a criminal, and this disregard for the law is just so uncivilized.

Good for them.

The ads are up in San Francisco buses, New York City subway stations, and soon D. C. subway stations. Check out #MySubwayAd if you want to learn more about exercising the rights that are legally only provided to people who can pay.

And P.S. Whenever powerful people call a group of people "savages," that's usually a good indication of where your loyalties ought to lie.